benchmarks deleted from geekbench over cheating

#Benchmarks deleted from geekbench over cheating skin#
#Benchmarks deleted from geekbench over cheating full#
#Benchmarks deleted from geekbench over cheating pro#

I hope they focus on Oxygen OS more than releasing singke product per year at affordable price points. But now Samsung has upped the game in software experience and Oppo/Vivo/Xiaomi has upped their game in camera department. One Plus 3T to One Plus 7T was One Plus peak era. I hope ZTE competes with them soon by producing quality products. Its just that they ruined everything with price and software updates after Oxygen OS 10.3.4. Oxygen OS was well managed till One Plus 6T/7T. I hope this is landmark in Google/Pixel line up with respect to camera and in house chipset for better control over software.

#Benchmarks deleted from geekbench over cheating pro#

I am excited to test Pixel 6/Pixel 6 Pro with snapdragon 870ish performance of battery life and CPU.

#Benchmarks deleted from geekbench over cheating skin#

It's literally optimization.Įxcept for some software glitches off late, Oxygen OS was well optimized Android skins just after stock Android bare skin which is present on Pixel Line up. This here is just running benchmarks unrestricted and it's restricting social media garbage as evident from the list of optimized apps. That was specifically targeting benchmarks to cheat. Cheating was when Realme (was it GT Neo?) was caught degrading output image in benchmarks into some mangled mess to artificially boost performance. So, this alone makes no sense to be called 'cheating'. I mean, what they have to gain if they slowdown daily apps and not benchmarks? When you cheat you kinda don't restrict daily apps and you artificially boost benchmarks to score better than the rest.

They're being scrutinized because they didn't communicate the thing to users and they just made it a transparent function that does the job without any user knowledge or interaction. The situation with OnePlus's 'cheating' is exactly the same thing. Good luck just filing a class lawsuit with Chinese company lmao. Problem was they didn't notify users about it or give them choice and that's where 'battery gate' came from, not all the stuff people make up here.Īnd only reason there was lawsuit and they paid it because it's a big American company.

#Benchmarks deleted from geekbench over cheating full#

They weren't doing this on phones with good batteries to imply planned obsolescence and if you replaced battery, you restored full performance. Phone isn't as fast, but it's still usable and wouldn't shut down anymore. Without chipset slowdown, phones were turning off and Apple mitigated that by simply slowing down chipset so it doesn't pull as much amps from battery to cause a shutdown. All the complaining came from lack of communication about the feature. Not that you Android fans would know what's like to use phone for 5+ years when you lose software support after just 2 but anyways. How the frigging hell was Apple 'caught' degrading battery when they were doing performance degrading IN RESPONSE to battery degradation which comes with age and usage. moreOh god, just proves you people have absolutely no clue what batterygate was even about yet you all harp about it endlessly like donkeys. Nobody pays 125 million dollar for no reason. Anonymous, Battery gate drama was entirely different.